Jesse Walden, managing partner at Variant Fund, suggests that the foundational cypherpunk principles that shaped early blockchain technology may diminish in significance over the next decade.
In a blog post dated September 30, Walden noted that the initial “cypherpunk” principles—such as censorship resistance, open source development, and permissionless access—that fueled the development of the first smart contract platforms might give way to a focus on speed and regulatory compliance due to increasing institutional adoption.
He highlighted that the first ten years of blockchain innovation were deeply influenced by Bitcoin’s core cypherpunk values, which aimed to create a democratic and equitable internet built on a shared computational infrastructure.
Currently, however, smart contract platforms are increasingly motivated by concerns like performance, cost-effectiveness, profitability, and legal compliance, overshadowing the more aspirational ideals that once guided them.
Another factor is the growing trend of institutional investors entering the blockchain space. These investors often have more conservative risk appetites and require more regulatory certainty before they are willing to invest. This will likely lead to a push for more standardized regulations and compliance frameworks.
While the VC acknowledged that there will always be a demand for decentralized and privacy-focused blockchains, he believes that the mainstream adoption of smart contract technology will be driven by platforms that are more willing to compromise on these ideals in exchange for greater regulatory certainty and institutional acceptance.
This prediction has sparked debate within the blockchain community. Some argue that the VC is simply out of touch with the underlying principles of blockchain technology, while others contend that he is accurately anticipating the inevitable evolution of the industry.
Regardless of the outcome, it is clear that the future of smart contract blockchains is likely to be shaped by a complex interplay of technological innovation, regulatory pressures, and market forces.
